Skip to content

Software Engineer at Heydoc

What's new in ECMAScript 2016 (ES7)

In June 2015 the TC39 (Technical Committee 39) officially released a spec of ECMAScript 2015 (colloquially known as a ES6). In parallel to the new spec, a new naming system within the language was introduced which is related with the new yearly release process. The plan is to release a new version of the language every year, and ship it with features that are ready at the time. ES2015 added a lot of amazing features. If you are not familiar with these fresh add-ons yet, check “ES6 Overview in 350 Bullet Points” by Nicolás Bevacqua. It’s the best summary that I have seen so far. Luckily we shouldn’t expect updates as huge every year which give us a chance to follow the spec.

The final list of features that we’re going to see in ECMAScript 2016 is ready and as expected, it is just a small update. Let’s have a look!

Array.prototype.includes #

This feature proposed by Domenic Denicola and Rick Waldron checks if the array includes an element and returns a boolean value. The syntax is super simple.

['a', 'b', 'c'].includes('a');  // true
['a', 'b', 'c'].includes('d');  // false

Previously we did it like this which is not as self explanatory.

['a', 'b', 'c'].indexOf('a') >= 0 ? true : false;  // true
['a', 'b', 'c'].indexOf('d') >= 0 ? true : false;  // false

This new feature also solves the problem of checking for NaN in an array. Compare these two examples and results.

['a', 'b', 'c', NaN].includes(NaN);  // true
['a', 'b', 'c', NaN].indexOf(NaN) >= 0 ? true : false;  // false

Exponentiation Operator #

Proposed by Rick Waldron, Claude Pache and Brendan Eich, this feature brings a much nicer notation to exponentiation. It uses infix notation which is much cleaner than function notation (Math.pow()). We can find the same notation in other programming languages like: Python, Ruby or Pearl. Have look at the examples.

2 ** 4;  // 16
let a = 2;
a **= 4; // 16

Previously…

Math.pow(2, 4);  // 16

Comments

  • a
    aaalsubaie

    why not just 2^4 instead of the strange **

    👆 you can use Markdown here

    Your comment is awaiting moderation. Thanks!
    • A
      Alex Sears

      That is already used in the language. It is the bitwise XOR operator.

      👆 you can use Markdown here

      Your comment is awaiting moderation. Thanks!
      • Pawel Grzybek
        Pawel Grzybek

        Exactly. Thanks for answer @searsaw:disqus. @aaalsubaie:disqus have a look. https://developer.mozilla.o...

        👆 you can use Markdown here

        Your comment is awaiting moderation. Thanks!
  • w
    write my essay for me

    That looks fantastic and really useful on someone's part in learning. through this, there will be a lot of people who could do something great with this tool that might be a perfect fit on their projects or on their studies.

    👆 you can use Markdown here

    Your comment is awaiting moderation. Thanks!

Leave a comment

👆 you can use Markdown here

Your comment is awaiting moderation. Thanks!